🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an celebration that started out as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are compensated to address Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has developed since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in the European continent as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A campaign to erase African American heritage and experience from the archives is under way. One of the former president's initial presidential directives aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how minimally it can be effective if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of historical achievements, rather than addressing the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just eliminate things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an era that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an foundation that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not avoid political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What value has simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Institutions who mark it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the dangers that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. Maybe an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.